WHO DOES THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INTEND TO SHOOT? WHY ARE THE FEDS STOCKING UP ON AMMO?

CLICK THE PIC FOR THE STORY. YOU MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND…. WHAT DO YOU THINK IS GOING ON HERE?

As the writer of this article states his concern over the constitutionality of these agencies actions, I too am concerned as to how and why these governmental agencies were able to create their own individual police agencies.  Add in the recent shotgun purchases by the Department of Education, and I too get a queasy feeling in my belly about these recent acquisitions.  Being a retired law enforcement person myself, I understand the need for duty ammo and training ammo and the importance of training with what you carry on duty.  However, even with this being said, these purchases still don’t pass the smell test.  How are these police forces being administrated?  Who oversees their operations?  Who or what agency certifies these officers?  What is their code of ethics (if any)?  These are just a few of the questions I have and I urge all concerned to contact your Representatives and Senators and demand an inquiry into this matter.  Personally, I don’t believe that these agencies have a legal right to stand up individual police forces.  The formation of these police forces constitutes a massive increase in federal police officers and the manner in which these were formed, allowed the feds to stand up these agencies without public scrutiny or knowledge for that matter.

The United States is a unique and wonderful country.  Founded by men who knew all to well, the power and the corruption of a government out of control, with its boot on the neck of its citizens.  These men went to great pains to formulate a government based on the premise that “All men are created equal”  with “Inalienable rights” given only by God, not man, and that the peoples of the United States will be a nation free from tyranny and injustice.  In reading our founding documents, The Federalist papers, The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution, you get a huge sense of nobility and altruism that went into the crafting of each and every document.  While not perfect, our Constitution has been the bulwark against the very tyranny our Founding Fathers sought to protect us from.  However, it seem now that very powerful people in the Federal Government look upon the Constitution as not a document of laws, but as a document merely full of suggestions, to only obey if convenient…..This is how a government that is supposed to be for “We The People”, becomes a government of “We The Government”, behind our backs…….  We must hold our elected officials accountable and make them pay a huge price at the polls come november.  It is like Benjamin Franklin said, ” Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. “

Advertisements

,

  1. #1 by Rwolf on 10/25/2012 - 7:57 am

    Could Obama use NDAA To Arrest Militias on the Premise members are Militants and Belligerents that pose a threat to National Security?

    Recently the Obama administration stated to Federal Judge Katherine Forest that under (NDAA) The National Defense Act of 2012 the President had authorization to lock up belligerents indefinitely. That they (were justified) to lock belligerents up indefinitely—because cases involving belligerents directly-aligned with militants against the good of America—warrants such punishment.) Pres. Obama could use NDAA provisions to order U.S. Military Forces to round up without evidence, millions of Americans including militias by alleging they are belligerents or a threat to National Security. Many observers believe Obama intends to extend NDAA to imprison U.S. Citizens in Indefinite Detention not involved with or associated with enemy forces.

    Hitler included similar provisions in his fascist (Discriminatory Decrees signed February 28, 1933). Almost Immediately after the German Parliament passed Hitler’s laws, the Reich Government ordered the arrest of German Citizens and confiscated their guns without probable cause or evidence; delegated powers to German Police and other authorities to arrest anyone Nazi authorities claimed attempted or incited public unrest: arrested among others were outspoken Germans, writers, journalists, peaceful protestors and artists. After World War II the East German Secret Police (Stasi) used the threat of Indefinite Detention to forcibly recruit thousands of informants.

    The U.S. 2012 NDAA legislation Obama signed 12-31-11 is similar to Hitler’s 1933 fascist laws the SS and Gestapo used to target persons in Germany for arrest, imprisonment and execution without probable cause; and confiscate millions of dollars of property. Hitler used his laws to suspend Parliament and the Supreme Court insuring his laws could not be rescinded.

    During the Obama Administration’s recent request for a (stay) to stop U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest blocking enforcement of vague NDAA provisions, the Obama Administration—never clarified what constitutes a (belligerent); or militant; or what belligerent activities (directly aligned with a militant) to order a belligerent’s arrest or indefinite detention; or what is against the good of America. Under vague provisions of NDAA, the President could accuse anyone of being (directly aligned with militants by way of any political or other association; activity, statement, writing or communication with an individual or group government deemed (militant) to arrest and indefinitely detain Americans. Writers, journalists, Americans that disagree with or question U.S. Government or its allies—may under NDAA be subject to arrest and indefinite detention.

    NDAA 2012, like Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Decrees enforces censorship; refers to the Patriot Act e.g. warrant-less searches of private property and forfeiture of property from persons not charged with crime. Provisions in NDAA 2012 keep the door open for corrupt U.S. police; government agents and provocateurs which there are many, to falsify reports and statements to target any American, group or organization for arrest, indefinite detention, complete disappearance; civil asset forfeiture of their property.

    You may have noted NDAA referred to the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act lends itself to Government / police corruption; the Federal Government may use secret witnesses and informants to cause arrests and civil asset forfeiture of Americans’ property. Witness(s) and informants may be paid up to 50% of assets forfeited. Federal Government under 18USC may use a mere preponderance of civil evidence, little more than hearsay to Civilly Forfeit Private Property. Under the Patriot Act innocent property owners may be barred by government knowing the evidence federal government uses to forfeit their property.

    Sections of NDAA 2012 are so broad, it appears U.S. Government or the President could (retroactively) deem an American’s past 1st Amendment activities prior to passage of 2012 NDAA—supported hostilities, terrorism or (Belligerents) to order the arrest and Indefinite Detention of any U.S. Citizen, writer, group or organization.

    Under NDAA 2012 it should be expected that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings when interrogated, not allowed legal counsel or habeas corpus may be prosecuted for non-terrorist (ordinary crimes) because of their (alleged admissions) while held in Indefinite Detention.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: