Archive for category HOT NEWS!!

RUSSIA SIGNS AGREEMEMNT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/JANET NAPOLITANO TO PROVIDE 15000+ TROOPS FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE IN AMERICA

CODE 3 EMERGENCY

CODE 3 EMERGENCY

Yea, you read that right..  I am at a loss on explaining how this could be a good thing for the American People.  Are they (The Feds) afraid that in the event of an emergency (martial law) that US troops will not fire on US citizens if ordered to?  This is beyond the pale and unacceptable on so many levels it is beyond explanation.  THERE NEEDS TO BE A FULL AND COMPLETE EXPOSE’ AND INVESTIGATION DONE ON THIS NOW!!!  Here are the reports:

http://www.infowars.com/foreign-troops-are-already-operating-inside-america/

http://www.inquisitr.com/828674/russian-troops-on-american-soil-confirmed/

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/15899-fema-signs-exchange-deal-with-russian-government

//

Leave a comment

WHO DOES THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INTEND TO SHOOT? WHY ARE THE FEDS STOCKING UP ON AMMO?

CLICK THE PIC FOR THE STORY. YOU MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND…. WHAT DO YOU THINK IS GOING ON HERE?

As the writer of this article states his concern over the constitutionality of these agencies actions, I too am concerned as to how and why these governmental agencies were able to create their own individual police agencies.  Add in the recent shotgun purchases by the Department of Education, and I too get a queasy feeling in my belly about these recent acquisitions.  Being a retired law enforcement person myself, I understand the need for duty ammo and training ammo and the importance of training with what you carry on duty.  However, even with this being said, these purchases still don’t pass the smell test.  How are these police forces being administrated?  Who oversees their operations?  Who or what agency certifies these officers?  What is their code of ethics (if any)?  These are just a few of the questions I have and I urge all concerned to contact your Representatives and Senators and demand an inquiry into this matter.  Personally, I don’t believe that these agencies have a legal right to stand up individual police forces.  The formation of these police forces constitutes a massive increase in federal police officers and the manner in which these were formed, allowed the feds to stand up these agencies without public scrutiny or knowledge for that matter.

The United States is a unique and wonderful country.  Founded by men who knew all to well, the power and the corruption of a government out of control, with its boot on the neck of its citizens.  These men went to great pains to formulate a government based on the premise that “All men are created equal”  with “Inalienable rights” given only by God, not man, and that the peoples of the United States will be a nation free from tyranny and injustice.  In reading our founding documents, The Federalist papers, The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution, you get a huge sense of nobility and altruism that went into the crafting of each and every document.  While not perfect, our Constitution has been the bulwark against the very tyranny our Founding Fathers sought to protect us from.  However, it seem now that very powerful people in the Federal Government look upon the Constitution as not a document of laws, but as a document merely full of suggestions, to only obey if convenient…..This is how a government that is supposed to be for “We The People”, becomes a government of “We The Government”, behind our backs…….  We must hold our elected officials accountable and make them pay a huge price at the polls come november.  It is like Benjamin Franklin said, ” Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. “

,

1 Comment

(UPDATED 071712 CRITICAL TRUTH UPDATE)(UPDATED 080112) HILLARY CLINTON AND OBAMA ARE GOING TO SIGN THE US INTO THE UN GUN CONTROL TREATY ON JULY 27TH 2012

HOT HOT HOT HOT HOT HOT HOT

IS THIS WHAT SHE IS THINKING? IS SHE A PATRIOT OR A _________________ FILL IN THE BLANK IN THE COMMENTS…..

Until I heard Dick Morris on Hannity today, I thought that we were going to be ok on this issue because it takes 2/3rds of the Senate to ratify any treaty, and since there is no way 2/3rds of the Senate would sign on to this, we were going to be good. Well, according to Dick Morris, in this case, this is not true. According to him, because the United States is a signator of the Geneva Conventions (I think this is what he said, I was driving and a little distracted, but the rest was clear), it will become binding upon the signature of the President and will remain so until the Senate votes to renounce it along with the President and Sec. of State. This of course will not happen if we lose these elections and even in the event of a lame duck senate, they will try to push this crap through. I urge you all to share this as much as possible and pass the word. Sign the petition and state your displeasure in the body of the letter to your Reps like I did.This is nothing short of an “End Run” around the Constitution and the will of the American Citizens and cannot be allowed to succeed.  These people MUST pay the political price at the polls this election cycle.  NEVER LOSE SIGHT OF THE FACT , it is the Dems who are working feverishly to get your guns and turn this nation into just another socialist European nation and they must be taken out of office now!

THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR ALL WHO LOVE THIS COUNTRY AND CARE ABOUT KEEPING IT THE LAND OF THE FREE AND THE BRAVE. THAT IS NO LONGER A PUNCH LINE….. STAND UP AND BE COUNTED.

CRITICAL UPDATE 071712

After doing a lot of detective work, I was able to decipher what is really going on with this issue.  First, it was not the Geneva Convention that Morris cited.  It was the Vienna Convention.  Most of the hub-bub is about section 12 of this document which basically outlines the binding nature of the document via the signators.  After finding this information I was lead to Richard Nixon who sent this to the Senate; http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=2036. 

Now you will read on this document; 185 – Message to the Senate Transmitting the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and the Optional Protocol Concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes  May 5, 1969.  I underline the key thing here…  Finding this, I went to Thomas/Library of Congress  and did a search for treaty “Vienna Convention”.  This is what is shown for the treaty in question;

Short Title:   VIENNA CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF TREATIES
Type:   International Law and Organization
Countries:   un–multilateral
Formal Title:   The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, signed for the United States on April 24, 1970


Legislative Actions   

Floor Action:   November 22, 1971 – Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations by unanimous consent.

Committee Action:   August 03, 1972 – Committee on Foreign Relations. Hearings held.
Committee Action:   August 08, 1972 – Committee on Foreign Relations. Committee consideration held.
Committee Action:   September 07, 1972 – Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with understandings and interpretation.
Committee Action:   September 19, 1972 – Committee on Foreign Relations. Committee consideration held.
Committee Action:   November 08, 1973 – Committee on Foreign Relations. Committee consideration held.
Committee Action:   April 30, 1974 – Committee on Foreign Relations. Committee consideration held. Index Terms :  
92-12
LAW OF TREATIES
T.DOC. 92-12
VIENNA CONVENTION
Control Number:  092TD00012
So as you can see, it was tabled and not ratified.  Therefore is non sequitur as it relates to this case in question.  Now there is another Vienna Convention treaty that WAS ratified, and that was  “VIENNA CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS WITH OPTIONAL PROTOCOL”.  The information is as follows:
Treaty Number:   91-5
Old Number:   Ex. E, 91st Congress, 1st Session
Transmitted:   May 05, 1969
Short Title:   VIENNA CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS WITH OPTIONAL PROTOCOL
Type:   Consular
Countries:   n/a
Senate Executive Report(s):   91-9
Related Document(s):   Ex. Rept. 91-9

Legislative Actions   

Floor Action:   May 05, 1969 – Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations by unanimous consent.
Floor Action:   October 21, 1969 – Reported by Senator Fulbright Committee on Foreign Relations, with printed report – Ex.Rept. 91-9.
Floor Action:   October 22, 1969 – Resolution of advice and consent to ratification agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay vote. 81-0. Record Vote No: 130 EX. Index Terms :  
COMPULSORY SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES
CONSULAR
CONSULAR RELATIONS
OPTIONAL PROTOCOL
SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES
VIENNA CONVENTION
Control Number:  091TD00005
So with all this being said, it looks like Dick Morris is a little off base on this issue.  This Vienna Convention treaty has nothing to do with the subject matter at hand so it seems that the Senate will still have to ratify this Arms treaty should Hillary and Obama sign us into it.  From all the reporting I am finding, it will be DOA in the Senate as there ae more than enough votes to kill it.  Below I am including a bunch of links that lead me to my conclusions.  I hope this information helps.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/rubio-romney-vp-candidate/2012/07/16/id/445539
http://christian-libertarian.org/2012/07/16/arms-trade-treaty-alarmism/
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=2036
http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2517&context=faculty_scholarship
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ntquery/D?trtys:5:./temp/~trtys5NyiFE::

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CFcQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foreign.senate.gov%2Fdownload%2F%3Fid%3D6A9E53D1-B925-4863-9590-DBF056D30B57&ei=aaAFUMvHEciP6wHvsqH4CA&usg=AFQjCNHHGRhiAGaULkfFDo-ofhBvLtnP3w&sig2=SUAV4OFaVYzOkaEeLLIKUQ

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/thomas    Go to Thomas and research 91st and 92nd congress/senate vienna convention.  Here will be the definitive data on the subject…

UPDATED 080112

The UN failed their attempt at this nefarious plan.  Click HERE for the details.

1 Comment

WASHINGTON STATE SENATOR MARIA CANTWELL CROWS ABOUT THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, aka OBAMACARE

SHE MUST NOT GO BACK THE U.S. SENATE! Click the pic to go to her opponent and contribute to his campaign.

“Thank you for contacting me United States Supreme Court’s decision affirming the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. I appreciate hearing from you on this important issue.

On June 28, 2012, in the landmark decision of National Federation of Independent Business et. al. v. Health and Human Services et al., the United States Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PL 111-148). The Supreme Court’s decision is an important step in upholding a law that will help drive down the cost of health care and increase access to those who don’t have coverage. Many important provisions will help reward the State of Washington for its cost-effective, outcome-based, delivery system.

Due to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, people can no longer be denied insurance coverage for pre-existing conditions. The law provides small businesses tax breaks for providing health insurance. It also will help provide cheaper prescription drugs for seniors, and will permit young adults to stay on their parents’ health insurance until age 26. It ends unfair penalties for Washington providers who deliver quality health care at a lower cost than other states, and it ensures Washington state’s Basic Health Plan will continue to serve as a national model for expanding access to care using bulk purchasing power. Finally, the law helps to build Washington state’s future health care workforce.

Ensuring that individuals have access to high quality affordable health care has always been a priority of mine. As a member of the Senate Finance Committee, I will continue to strongly advocate for increased access to quality health care, affordable health care cost, and improved efficiency of our medical delivery system.

Thank you again for contacting me to share your thoughts on this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future if I can be of further assistance.

Sincerely,

Maria Cantwell

United States Senator”

MY COMMENTS:  After all we now know about this Obamanation of a law, this poor example of a Senator has the chutzpah to crow about it now.  She is exposing herself for all of us to see what she really is, just another Liberal/Progressive who wants to make you a servant of big government who in-turn will be telling you what kind of healthcare you will be ALLOWED to have.  She is just another tax and spend liberal who believes that raising taxes is the answer to all our ills.  As I indicated in a earlier post, she is just another career politician, who happens to be one of those terrible millionaires who doesn’t pay enough taxes, but says we should pay more but I doubt that she pays any more that she has too.  Don’t ever lose sight of the fact that the $250k they talk about as the limit, those below won’t pay more, that $250k is gross pay, not net!  So almost all small business people will get hammered.  SHE IS A DYED IN THE WOOL LIBERAL/PROGRESSIVE PERIOD!  She must be voted out of office this election!

 

2 Comments

CHINA CAN SHUT DOWN ALL TELECOMUNICATION ELECTRONICS IN THE UNITED STATES

CLICK THE PIC FOR THE STORY

This revelation should not surprise anyone.  China, as is Russia, are doing everything they can, individually and collectively, to bring down The United States.   To  buy in to the notion that these nations are our friends, is plain foolishness and naive.  It is our politicians who have forced this notion on us and have set up the circumstances in which China has become so prevalent in our marketplace.  When Chinese counterfeit electronic and hard parts have infiltrated our military, it is truly a serious situation.  It is my assertion that all of these parts were designed to fail, or in the case being reported here, operate in such a way that causes a shutdown or failure of critical defense systems in times of critical performance.  This is not by accident but design and our politicians must stop this trend, reverse it and eliminate the use of all foreign-made military parts.  Click the pic for details.

1 Comment

CHICAGO THUGGERY – “YOUR 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHTS CAN BE TERMINATED”

1 Comment

OBAMA AWARDS SOCIALIST WITH MEDAL OF FREEDOM………Hmmmmm

DELORES HUERTA – CLICK PIC FOR THE STORY

I just wanted to post this just to reiterate, illustrate and highlight the acts of a President who evidently thinks socialism is okay, which just happens to be the antithesis of our government which espouses freedom and accountability.   There really isn’t a whole lot more to say at this point.  He is overtly tipping his hand.  Anyone else but me paying attention to this?  It is my prediction that between now and election day, we will witness conduct from the Office of The President we have never seen before.  We will bear witness to a man who will stoop to any low and say any thing in order to do whatever he thinks he must do to get his second term, which by the way, he will use to complete his agenda and “fundamentally change” our nation.  I hope the rest of the world is paying attention to this because the socialist/Marxist agenda will be in full exposure.  The world will either witness a nation win back its soul, or, sink into oblivion, resulting in the demise of our Republic and way of life….  I ask all those who relish and cherish freedom and The United States, to pray for us……..

2 Comments

THE TREATIES AND OTHER NEFARIOUS DEEDS OBAMA WANTS TO SIGN INTO BEFORE HE GETS TOSSED OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE

Must have had Shih-Tzu for lunch……….

Thanks to Dick Morris, this information has come to light about several sneaky things Obama and Hillary are up to; 1. International Criminal Court , 2. The Law of the Sea Treaty, 3. Small-arms control, 4. Outer Space Code of Conduct, 5. Rights of the Child.

This is truly scary stuff that if enacted would spell the end of the United States and its sovereignty.  This is no joke, especially if you consider the very real likelihood that this could all come to pass because,….if the Democrats in the Senate take a drubbing like I think they will, that will create the “Lame Duck” Senate that Obama would want and use to get all these treaties ratified, simply because all the outgoing Senators will not have anything to lose, they lost already, so who cares right?  I will be writing letters to my 2 Democrat Senators telling them to not even think about it!  I suggest everyone else do the same.  Click HERE and HERE for the information.

1 Comment

CHINA’S MINING INTERESTS IN THE UNITED STATES

China stealing our resources with a smile.......... Click the pic for complete details.

Yes, China is mining our resources in the gold ol’ US of A.  Who in their right patriotic mind would allow this to happen?  I can tell you, ALL THE POLITICIANS IN DC!  Yes, we have literally been sold out by or Representatives in DC.  Obviously to the highest bidder, and one I might add, does not give a damn about the USA, as demonstrated by their embargo on strategic rare-earth metals.  Who else out there saw this coming?  Really,  I want to know!!!  I guess the fact is lost on everyone except the citizenry who still had their head screwed squarely on their shoulders, unlike those in DC.  This has to stop.  I have a question; Why is it that China gets approval to mine and do whatever else they want to do, but US companies get the EPA boot on the neck?  Click here and here for the story and click the pic to go to the China Mining United site.

1 Comment

OBAMA PLANS TO PUSH MILITARY RETIREES INTO HIS “OBAMACARE” HEALTH CO-OPS

I WANT YOU!! And we WILL get you...

I hate to say “I told you so”, but….”I told you so”…  Way back when the Pelosi/Reid ran congress was working on “Obamacare”, I was telling everyone, to include all the liberals I work with that this was what was going to happen to the military, and damned if I’m not right.  This was his/they’re plan all along.  They plan to screw the very people that stand up and VOLUNTEER to protect this great country, and yet they expect people in the military to continue to happily continue to serve.  I think these idiot Dems/Libs are sorely mistaken.  We vets will not sit still for this.  I will be writing my Reps ASAP on this issue and I hope all my fellow Vets do the same.  I do think though there is an ulterior motive/goal at work here.  I think it is within the realm of possibility that ultimately these idiots do want the military retention rates to plummet.  This would provide the impetus for the DOD to do way with the all volunteer military.  This in-turn would allow the DOD to severely slash the military pay and benefits because at that point conscription, or the draft will have been reimplemented in order to maintain adequate troop levels.   So, there will be no need for the higher wages.    Done deal……  Our military will have been reduced to just another 2nd or 3rd rate force……  Think I am wrong?   I don’t……..  Click the pic for the story…

MY LETTER TO MY REPS:

I have just learned that President Obama plans to shift all the military retiree medical into the Obamacare’s state-run insurance exchanges by making Tri-Care costs so high and prohibited that most if not all retirees will be forced into exchanges.  This draconian plan is beyond the pale in design and intent and we retirees and veterans will not stand for this atrocious plan.  We vets will find it impossible to support ANY member of Congress that supports this plan.  We will make our voices be heard during your next election cycle should you vote in favor of this extraordinarily repugnant plan. We will be watching your actions and votes on this issue.

Leave a comment

N.J. LEGISLATORS LOOK FOR A “WORK-AROUND” ON CIRCUMVENTING THE 2ND AMENDMENT

PRICE US OUT OF THE MARKET? YEA, IF THEY GET THE CHANCE!!

Leave it to the little industrious commie legislators to look for every work-around possible on getting around the 2nd Amendment.  Hey, if they can’t outlaw or otherwise further regulate guns, they are going to go after the ammunition we need to make them functional…  If this legislation passes, it will be the camel nose under the tent and the full court press on taxing ammo will begin.  I urge all to keep an eye on your own legislature in order to be on top of this subject should it raise its ugly head in your state…  Click the pic for the story…

Leave a comment

(UPDATED 120111/120811) S.1867 WILL KILL DEMOCRACY AND AMERICA AS WE KNEW IT……..

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Franklin's Contributions to the Conference on February 17 (III) Fri, Feb 17, 1775

I am asking all voting Americans to contact your Senators and demand that they not vote in favor of this legislation, “S.1867 – Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012”.  As much as I despise  the ACLU, they are right on this issue and we must not stand for this latest assault on the American Public.  You take the DHS publication on Extremism, and couple it with this legislation and  you will see that the forces inside the Federal Government that want to put us all in jail are still at work and is alive and well.  This could be the final shot across our bow that seals our fate.  If this language is left in this legislation and passes both the House and Senate and is signed into law, (which I have no doubt the current occupier of the WH will do) the great experiment called Democracy, that our Founding Fathers established, will be dead.  This is not an exaggeration or doom and gloom stuff.  If you don’t think so, you’re simply ignorant or not paying attention.  In either case, we’re all in trouble.    Click here and here for the details.

There is another issue with this legislation because it also covers the Tri-Care medical program that military retirees use.  It states;

SEC. 701. ANNUAL COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENT IN ENROLLMENT FEES IN TRICARE PRIME.

(a) In General- Section 1097a of title 10, United States Code, is amended–

(1) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f) as subsections (d), (e), (f), and (g), respectively; and

(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c):

`(c) Cost-of-living Adjustment in Enrollment Fee- (1) Whenever after September 30, 2012, the Secretary of Defense increases the retired pay of members and former members of the armed forces pursuant to section 1401a of this title, the Secretary shall increase the amount of the fee payable for enrollment in TRICARE Prime by an amount equal to the percentage of such fee payable on the day before the date of the increase of such fee that is equal to the percentage increase in such retired pay. In determining the amount of the increase in such retired pay for purposes of this subsection, the Secretary shall use the amount computed pursuant to section 1401a(b)(2) of this title. The increase in such fee shall be effective as of January 1 following the date of the increase in such retired pay.

`(2) The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register the amount of the fee payable for enrollment in TRICARE Prime whenever increased pursuant to this subsection.’.

So what it saying is, if retirees get a COLA increase in their retirement checks,they will use Tri-Care to get it back…… This is the kind of back door, back stabbing legislation we Vets and Americans are sick of.  Those in congress who push this type of legislation must be voted out of office as we reform our REPRESENTATIVE form of government.

MY LETTER TO MY REPS ON THIS:

I am writing as your constituent in the 3rd Congressional district of Washington. I oppose S.1867 – Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, and am tracking it using OpenCongress.org, the free public resource website for government transparency and accountability. This legislation is a direct assault on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and if you vote in favor of this Bill in its present form, you will be in violation of your oath of office and that will not go unnoticed. As Benjamin Franklin said on Feb 17th, 1775, “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” This struggle we find ourselves in now is not to be used as justification to tear our democracy asunder. We citizens are relying on you to protect our inviolate foundational tenets and GOD GIVEN RIGHTS. We demand you do so or you will most definitely find yourself voted out of office come your next election cycle. As this letter is being sent to all three of my Representatives in Congress, this legislation will not go before the House unless the Senate gives it an up vote. If it is passed in the Senate and goes to the House, my Representative in the House will be held to the same standard as my Senators. Our Democracy is in danger, do the right thing and vote no on this democracy killing legislation.

REPLY FROM CANTWELL:  (sort of..)

Thank you for contacting me regarding the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012. I appreciate hearing from you on this matter.

Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) introduced the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 on May 5, 2011.  This legislation was passed by the Senate Armed Services Committee by a vote of 26-0 on November 15, 2011.  The National Defense Authorization Act is enacted each fiscal year to specify the budget and expenditures of the U.S. Department of Defense.  The National Defense Authorization Act for 2012 includes numerous provisions that relate to the treatment of terrorism detainees.  One such provision requires that any detainee caught on U.S. soil must be remanded to the U.S. military for custody.  This provision is strongly opposed by the White House and the Department of Defense; both entities have stated that it will limit current options available to our counter-terrorism officials. However, the legislation also allows the Administration to waive the mandatory custody requirement.  The bill also provides for an exemption for any mandatory custody transfer that would interfere with ongoing civilian law enforcement surveillance or interrogation efforts.  Please be assured that I will keep your thoughts should I have the opportunity to vote on these or similar provisions. I am profoundly grateful for the service of our brave men and women in the armed services and for the sacrifices they have made to defend and preserve our great nation.  As such, we have an important responsibility to ensure that they have the tools and resources they need to successfully complete their mission and return home safe.  Please be assured that I will continue to work with my colleagues on behalf of the many soldiers in the state of Washington.

Thank you again for contacting me to share your thoughts on this matter.  You may also be interested in signing up for periodic updates for Washington State residents.  If you are interested in subscribing to this update, please visit my website at http://cantwell.senate.gov.  Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future if I can be of further assistance.

Sincerely,
Maria Cantwell
United States Senator

My Comment;

NOTICE HOW SHE DOES NOT TOUCH ON MY CONCERNS?  IS SHE RESPONSIVE TO OUR CONCERNS?  I SAY NO!

SENATE SAYS NO TO UDALL AMENDMENT that would have taken the worst out of this Bill.

UPDATED 120111

Vote on 1 Dec 11

 


 

UPDATED 120811

SENATOR CANTWELL RESPONSE

Leave a comment

(UPDATED 112811)THE EU IS ALL UPSET ABOUT THE USA AND OTHER INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES DELAYING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CLIMATE CHANGE AGENDA

CLICK THE PIC FOR THE STORY

I find this BBC story very enlightening and disturbing at the same time.  It is a great indicator of how the rest of the world has been bamboozled by the UN and have bought into the global warming scam lock, stock and barrel.  For this reason alone, we must keep pressure on our Representatives to NOT buy into this scam in any way shape or form.  As you can read, there seems to be some negotiations or meetings going on that the media is not reporting. Gee, imagine that!!!!  Read this article and pass it on.

UPDATE 112811

MORE DATA

Leave a comment

LEON PANETTA SAYS BENEFITS FOR MILITARY RETIREES MAY BE CUT AND IS “ON THE TABLE”

IS LEON PANETTA A TRAITOR TO THE VERY MILITARY MEMBERS HE COMMANDS INCLUDING THE RETIREES?

My letter to Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler on this subject:

In a recent article I read on “The New York Times” website, it recounted recent statements being made by Leon Panetta that a reduction of retired military benefits will be on the table and out of pocket increases will be incurred by us retired military people.   I have written you on several occasions expressing my concerns regarding Tri-Care and the possibility that the budget will be balanced on the backs of the Vets and Military Retirees.  You have replied to my concerns stating that you will resist all efforts to further erode the retirement benefits that I worked over 20 years to get, that, by the way, was promised to me all those years ago.  In the years since my initial enlistment, which was in 1975, I have bared witness to the steady reneging on the Governments part, of the retirement benefits of those serving this nation.  You as a Representative of Congress, and as a body, must never lose sight of the fact that each and every man and woman who served and are currently serving in the military are volunteers.  They/we have volunteered to defend this great land, with our lives if need be, in order to preserve the American way of life.  That act alone, is worthy of honor AND backing and support of the very government we defend.  It is my sincere prediction that if Congress once again, turns its back on the military members and further erodes the promised benefits of those who serve, you will see a steady, unrelenting decline in the numbers of people who will be willing to “volunteer” and stand up for this once great nation.  I dare say, Congress is not contemplating a reduction in their retirement benefits, are they?  Are you?  You have to serve a much shorter time to get your benefits that I had to, yet you are fully vested after 5 years and will retirement with full benefits.  I am unable to find any information regarding the medical benefits that are afforded you and others in Congress. I am troubled by that fact.  The lack of information on this subject is troubling at best.  Could you enlighten me and explain/outline the medical benefits afforded both serving and retired members of Congress?  My readers have the right to know what we tax payers are paying for, especially when it involves the pay and benefits of those we choose to send to Washington DC.  Bluntly stated, I will accept a reduction in benefits when Congress does the same.

In closing, I continue to urge both you and the rest of the Conservatives in Congress to strongly resist any further changes in the military benefits that would either lessen services or cause an increase in “out-of-pocket” expenses of the retirees or any other class of military vets.  It is immoral for a nation to punish the very people whom you rely on to protect this great country.  When I signed my contract with The United States of America, way back in 1975, the government promised me certain things if I kept up my end of the bargain.  Well, I did, will the USA do the same and keep its end of the bargain?  So far, it hasn’t.  It is up to you to restore what is rightfully ours.  The next election cycle is just around the corner for you and your re-election is not guaranteed.  I sent you to DC for a reason and that was to stand up for me and be my voice along with the other thousands of Vets who rely on your support.  I am expecting you and your like-minded Conservatives to do just that.  Do not “cave” into those who wish to further erode the militaries pay and benefits just to make a “deal” and make political points by trying to look like you’re being ‘bi-partisan”.  You are our shoulder to the dike, holding back the tide.  Stay the fight, make those who wish to do us vets harm, blink first.

Letter to Senator Patty Murray:

In a recent article I read on “The New York Times” website, it recounted recent statements being made by Leon Panetta that a reduction of retired military benefits will be on the table and out of pocket increases will be incurred by us retired military people.   I have written you on several occasions expressing my concerns regarding Tri-Care and the possibility that the budget will be balanced on the backs of the Vets and Military Retirees.  You have replied to my concerns using very broad terms and not committing to resisting all efforts to further erode the retirement benefits that I worked over 20 years to get, that, by the way, was promised to me all those years ago.  In the years since my initial enlistment, which was in 1975, I have bared witness to the steady reneging on the Governments part, of the retirement benefits of those serving this nation.  You as a member of Congress, and as a body, must never lose sight of the fact that each and every man and woman who served and are currently serving in the military are volunteers.  They/we have volunteered to defend this great land, with our lives if need be, in order to preserve the American way of life.  That act alone, is worthy of honor AND backing and support of the very government we defend.  It is my sincere prediction that if Congress once again, turns its back on the military members and further erodes the promised benefits of those who serve, you will see a steady, unrelenting decline in the numbers of people who will be willing to “volunteer” and stand up for this once great nation.  I dare say, Congress is not contemplating a reduction in their retirement benefits, are they?  Are you?  You have to serve a much shorter time to get your benefits that I had to, yet you are fully vested after 5 years and will retirement with full benefits.  Bluntly stated, I will accept a reduction in benefits when Congress does the same.  You being on the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Subcommittee, the Defense Subcommittee and the “Super Committee, you are in a prime position to preserve the benefits we veterans sacrificed so long for.

In closing, I continue to urge you to strongly resist any further changes in the military benefits that would either lessen services or cause an increase in “out-of-pocket” expenses of the retirees or any other class of military vets.  It is immoral for a nation to punish the very people whom you rely on to protect this great country.  When I signed my contract with The United States of America, way back in 1975, the government promised me certain things if I kept up my end of the bargain.  Well, I did, will the USA do the same and keep its end of the bargain?  So far, it hasn’t.  It is up to you to restore what is rightfully ours.  The next election cycle is coming up in ’16  and your re-election is not guaranteed, especially if you fail the vets.  You were sent to DC for a reason and that was to stand up for me and be my voice along with the other thousands of Vets who rely on your support.  I am expecting you to do just that.  Do not “cave” into those who wish to further erode the militaries pay and benefits just to make a “deal” and make political points by trying to look like you’re being ‘bi-partisan”.  You are our shoulder to the dike, holding back the tide.  Stay the fight, make those who wish to do us vets harm, blink first.  We are watching and we vote.

note: With a few changes, this letter was also sent to Senator Maria Cantwell

Leave a comment

BOEHNER: DEBT DEAL WILL INCLUDE NEW TAX REVENUES; My letter to Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler Republican, 3rd District, Washington, on this issue

HERRERA-BEUTLER

JAIME HERRERA-BEUTLER

It is disheartening to read that Majority Leader Boehner has stated that additional tax revenues are now on the table.  As my Representative, I sent you to Washington to hold the line against the Democrats attempts at further bankrupting and taxing the American people, at all costs.  It is a fallacy to believe that it is okay to tax corporate America too.  Any and all taxes are passed on to the consumer and the result is just inflation and higher prices for whatever commodity is taxed.  We as a nation are at a crossroads and we conservatives expect you to turn right, not left on all issues.  The left must be the party to bend, as they mistakenly expect the conservative right to do.  As a voter, I can tell you that if the Republicans do not stick to holding the tide and keeping this nation from sinking any further, I would think that the Representative who acquiesce to the Left, will find their next election cycle very tough and difficult as they will have to answer up to their Constituents.

Sincerely

xxxxxx

Fully Engaged Voter

Leave a comment

SPY STREETLIGHTS – IS BIG BROTHER IMPLIMENTING ANOTHER LAYER OF “SECURITY” BEHIND OUR BACKS?

After reading these revelations, I am convinced that DHS is implementing another layer of “big brother” security, all of course for our own good and safety and all.  YEA,…….RIGHT………. This is a bit too much to handle.  Check out the story here and look at the video and come up with your own conclusions…..

Leave a comment

WHITE HOUSE TO SIGN UBER CAFTA INTO LAW TODAY BEHIND CLOSED DOORS

Click pic for more info.... How safe are these 3rd world country trucks???

As this article goes on to explain, president obama (small case intentional) is signing this in the Oval Office so he can control the press, ie the pictures that get published.  His reasoning may be that he does not want to appear like he is working with the Republicans on this issue so as to not piss off more of his base.  I am totally disappointed in the legislation because of all the reasons I have mentioned in previous articles on this subject. Here and Here.  The GOP screwed the pooch on this one.   I am very confident that I am right on this issue and it will be proven out in the next few years as more US industry moves into the “CAFTA Zone” of influence.  All this is going to do is further erode US wages, put more inferior products in the market  and further add to the retreat of the American standard of living.  The crafters and supporter of CAFTA say it is going to provide America with the needed jobs to get this economy back on its feet, I beg to differ.  History says the opposite is true.  Third World countries cannot afford the products we would build here.  Our wages and overhead are not conducive to making the products these poor countries can afford because if made with proper US wages, the products would be priced out of their price range and if wages were drastically reduced, the wages paid to the US workers would not be enough to live on at all.  Not even close.   So either way, it’s not going to work.  Also, as a side note along these same lines, today, Oct 21, 2011, the US started allowing Mexican trucks to cross the border and deliver their loads directly to their destinations.  This effectively takes jobs away from the US trucking industry.  How does this help American jobs ?  This is a result of  NAFTA.  Whats next, trucks from Central America?……..yea, I’ll bet so….  This is a step towards multi-nationalism I am not comfortable with at all….  It’s just another step towards the marginalization of Americanism and it will lead to more…….

Leave a comment

Rep. Michael Rogers-3rd District, Alabama , Rep. Peter King, Rep. Mo Brooks, Rep. Chip Cravaack, Rep. Daniel Lungren, all Republicans • Sponsors H.R.3011 – Transportation Security Administration Authorization Act of 2011

THE GOP ATTACKS FREE SPEECH - CLICK THE PIC FOR THE STORY

HOT HOT HOT

In Section 295 of  HR 3011, there is language that make it against the law to basically criticize the Federal Government which in-turn is a flagrant violation of the 1st Amendment under the Bill of Rights.  At a minimum, this section should be stricken from this legislation.  Until then, I urge all to vote “no” on this HR.  I am shocked that this legislation is sponsored by the GOP.  What part of “Constitution” and Bill of Rights”, don’t they get?  This Congressman Rogers is in his 5th term and it is obvious he has forgotten what his duties are in DC.  I think I can say with a certain amount of certainty that it not to violate his constituents rights.  This is the type of conduct we routinely see coming from the Leftist Democrats but I guess we have to keep a keen eye out for the Right doing the same.  I am further shocked that Rep King is listed as a Co-Sponsor, given his pro-Constitution and Bill of Rights rhetoric.  The complete list of Co-Sponsors of this HR is ;

Rep. Mo Brooks [R, AL-5]..   Rep. Chip Cravaack [R, MN-8]….Rep. Peter King [R, NY-3]

Rep. Daniel Lungren [R, CA-3]Rep. Timothy Walberg [R, MI-7]   Republicans all .

MY LETTER TO MY REPRESENTATIVE ON THIS ISSUE, MINUS THE INCLUDED SECTION 295;

This is a direct assault on the 1st Amendment and this section should be stricken from this Bill.  As an American Citizen, I have the RIGHT to be critical of and criticize the Federal Government in any way I see fit, short of slander, which must be proven by those slandered by said remarks.  I am shocked that it is the GOP sponsoring this Bill and I will be advising everybody I can on this latest assault on our God given rights as outlined by the Bill of Rights.  You can be assured that if you vote Aye on this Bill, you will not in any way shape or form, have any support for you in your next election cycle and I will work tirelessly to make sure you are primaried.

Leave a comment

(UPDATED 101211) HOUSE COMMITTEE GIVES THE NOD TO 3 FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS

THAT GIANT SUCKING SOUND YOU HEAR WILL BE MORE JOBS HEADING SOUTH..... CLICK THE PIC FOR THE STORY

I am highlighting this because I remember when the last free trade agreement was made and I remember what happened………If memory serves, when NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) was signed, everyone in DC said that it would prove to be a boom to business here in the USA.  Well, it really didn’t work out that way.  Seems to me, it worked out great for everyone EXCEPT the USA.  The next thing we saw was the tail lights of our manufacturing base heading south of the border, and now they want to extend that into Central America in what is called CAFTA (Central American Free Trade Agreement).  It is my opinion that this is just more bad decision making from DC when we cannot stand another hit like we took with NAFTA.  If this happens, I just don’t see how corporations are going to be lulled back into the States to rebuild the jobs lost when they left to begin with.  Now they will build factories all the way down through Central America.  How does that help the US Workers?  It seems by this article that they are more concerned about the workers in Columbia.  Why would that be, other than the obvious?   The logic is supposed to be that we care about the poor workers of the indigenous companies in those countries covered by CAFTA, but could it be that when US companies move their operations down there, they don’t want the bad PR associated with worker mistreatment?  Gee, could be…..  These agreements in my opinion should not happen.  I predict we will suffer for it, not benefit………

UPDATE 101211

This plan has passed the House.  It is expected to pass the Senate easily.  I predict  more US industry heading south….Say goodbye to more jobs!

Leave a comment

LEFT WINGERS ARE TRYING TO INDOCTRINATE YOUR CHILD INTO ACCEPTING ISLAMIC PRICIPALS

Is this happening in your child's school? Click the pic for the story.

As this story outlines, this school district is using the classroom to indoctrinate your child into thinking that the perverted principals contained in the Koran are ok and acceptable.  These course materials are supplied by the State Government and I think this is unacceptable and I hope that all parents take an active role in their child’s education in the public school system and review all the various courses and curriculum in the schools they send their kids to.  This insidiousness cannot be allowed to stand.  Parents who find objectionable materials that are being pushed by the teachers must speak up and stop this back door attempt to brainwash our kids.  Get involved and ask a lot of questions.  Besides, why is the State Government pushing Islam?  I think we all know the answer……..

1 Comment