Archive for category MOVE TOWARDS POLICE STATE

RUSSIA SIGNS AGREEMEMNT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/JANET NAPOLITANO TO PROVIDE 15000+ TROOPS FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE IN AMERICA

CODE 3 EMERGENCY

CODE 3 EMERGENCY

Yea, you read that right..  I am at a loss on explaining how this could be a good thing for the American People.  Are they (The Feds) afraid that in the event of an emergency (martial law) that US troops will not fire on US citizens if ordered to?  This is beyond the pale and unacceptable on so many levels it is beyond explanation.  THERE NEEDS TO BE A FULL AND COMPLETE EXPOSE’ AND INVESTIGATION DONE ON THIS NOW!!!  Here are the reports:

http://www.infowars.com/foreign-troops-are-already-operating-inside-america/

http://www.inquisitr.com/828674/russian-troops-on-american-soil-confirmed/

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/15899-fema-signs-exchange-deal-with-russian-government

//

Leave a comment

WHO DOES THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INTEND TO SHOOT? WHY ARE THE FEDS STOCKING UP ON AMMO?

CLICK THE PIC FOR THE STORY. YOU MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND…. WHAT DO YOU THINK IS GOING ON HERE?

As the writer of this article states his concern over the constitutionality of these agencies actions, I too am concerned as to how and why these governmental agencies were able to create their own individual police agencies.  Add in the recent shotgun purchases by the Department of Education, and I too get a queasy feeling in my belly about these recent acquisitions.  Being a retired law enforcement person myself, I understand the need for duty ammo and training ammo and the importance of training with what you carry on duty.  However, even with this being said, these purchases still don’t pass the smell test.  How are these police forces being administrated?  Who oversees their operations?  Who or what agency certifies these officers?  What is their code of ethics (if any)?  These are just a few of the questions I have and I urge all concerned to contact your Representatives and Senators and demand an inquiry into this matter.  Personally, I don’t believe that these agencies have a legal right to stand up individual police forces.  The formation of these police forces constitutes a massive increase in federal police officers and the manner in which these were formed, allowed the feds to stand up these agencies without public scrutiny or knowledge for that matter.

The United States is a unique and wonderful country.  Founded by men who knew all to well, the power and the corruption of a government out of control, with its boot on the neck of its citizens.  These men went to great pains to formulate a government based on the premise that “All men are created equal”  with “Inalienable rights” given only by God, not man, and that the peoples of the United States will be a nation free from tyranny and injustice.  In reading our founding documents, The Federalist papers, The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution, you get a huge sense of nobility and altruism that went into the crafting of each and every document.  While not perfect, our Constitution has been the bulwark against the very tyranny our Founding Fathers sought to protect us from.  However, it seem now that very powerful people in the Federal Government look upon the Constitution as not a document of laws, but as a document merely full of suggestions, to only obey if convenient…..This is how a government that is supposed to be for “We The People”, becomes a government of “We The Government”, behind our backs…….  We must hold our elected officials accountable and make them pay a huge price at the polls come november.  It is like Benjamin Franklin said, ” Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. “

,

1 Comment

IS THE TSA HIRING CRIMINALS AND PSYCOPATHS AS SCREENERS? REALLY?!?!?!

Is this the harsh reality of the matter? I hope not. Click the pic for the information

According to this article,a TSA Supervisor has come forward and state that the agency has been directed to hire wackos in order to help push the people into accepting the coming police state…..  Well, I really don’t know what to think about this so-called revelation.  Could it be that there are actually people in the Federal Government who are brazen enough to admit to this crazy, out of the blue, unreal,  “conspiracy” of sorts?  The really scary thing is,….  in this administration, I believe it’s possible.  If true, this revelation should stand as a shot across the bow of every citizen in this nation.  Is this where we as a nation and society want to go?  Are all the “alarmist” FEMA campers right?  Has our government been conspiring against us, and if so, will the patriots in the military allow this to happen or will they stand up and say NO?!   This in my opinion, is the crux of the matter.  How patriotic are our military members?  If this is true, I’ll guess we’ll find out……..one way or the other..

Leave a comment

IS THERE ANY TRUTH TO THE RUMOR OF FEMA CAMPS IN THE US? ……. MAYBE SO..

WHICH REGION ARE YOU IN?

“The American Thinker” is a very reputable web site that does not delve into “Conspiracy Theory” stuff, so in the process of doing some research on another story, I stumbled on this information.  It caused me to sit up and take notice and coupled with what I was researching, it is concerning.   Click here for the story I was researching and click here for the American Thinker article.  Check it out, download the pdf here and make up your own mind……..

Leave a comment

ANOTHER “OUT OF CONTROL” CITY COUNCIL VIOLATES CITIZENS 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHTS – FATHER NATHAN MONK AT PENSACOLA CITY COUNCIL

In watching this video, I find it very disturbing that this Council THINKS it has the right to shut the citizenry up and not allow dissenting voices to be heard.  I especially find it most disturbing that the Officers (or more aptly put “Thugs” were more than eager to violate this Priests 1st Amendment Rights.  Everyone on that council must be recalled or removed and those so-called “Officers” need to be fired.  Those guys need to figure out which side they are on, fascism, or democracy and the Constitution and Bill of Rights.  Those men in my opinion should be shunned along with their families.  Their conduct is despicable and disgraceful and un-American…..

 

10 Comments

(UPDATED 022112 WITH REPLY FROM CONGRESSWOMAN JAMIE HERERRA-BUETLER – UPDATED 121911 WITH REPLY FROM SENATOR PATTY MURRAY) (UPDATED WITH VIDEO) WASHINGTON REPRESENTATIVE JAIME HERRERA-BEUTLER AND SENATORS CANTWELL AND MURRAY VOTES AWAY OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS / CONGRESSIONAL VOTING RECORD ON THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012

OUR FUTURE HOMES? MAYBE............

As this article outlines, this bill is so draconian you might as well tear up the Bill of Rights.  I am appalled that Congress would do such a thing.  It is now legal to use the might of the United States military against its own citizens in the USA.  All the government needs to do is use the laws and guidelines, the very same ones I have been highlighting on this web site, determine that whatever you are doing falls within the “you might be a terrorist if” guidelines published by the DHA, and the next thing you know, you have the DOD breaking down your door at 3am and hauling you off to jail because simply, they can….  That IS where we are now thanks to the very people who we sent to DC to protect our rights and I am so very disappointed in my Rep.  She is a Freshman and was specifically sent to NOT do what she just did.  Check the list below to see how your Rep voted.  It is truly a bleak and black day in and for America………………

Votes by Representative

Name Voted
Rep. Gary Ackerman [D, NY-5] Aye
Rep. Sandy Adams [R, FL-24] Aye
Rep. Robert Aderholt [R, AL-4] Aye
Rep. Todd Akin [R, MO-2] Aye
Rep. Rodney Alexander [R, LA-5] Aye
Rep. Jason Altmire [D, PA-4] Aye
Rep. Justin Amash [R, MI-3] Nay
Rep. Mark Amodei [R, NV-2] Aye
Rep. Robert Andrews [D, NJ-1] Aye
Rep. Steve Austria [R, OH-7] Aye
Rep. Joe Baca [D, CA-43] Aye
Rep. Michele Bachmann [R, MN-6] Abstain
Rep. Spencer Bachus [R, AL-6] Aye
Rep. Tammy Baldwin [D, WI-2] Nay
Rep. Lou Barletta [R, PA-11] Aye
Rep. John Barrow [D, GA-12] Aye
Rep. Roscoe Bartlett [R, MD-6] Aye
Rep. Joe Barton [R, TX-6] Aye
Rep. Karen Bass [D, CA-33] Nay
Rep. Charles Bass [R, NH-2] Aye
Rep. Xavier Becerra [D, CA-31] Nay
Rep. Dan Benishek [R, MI-1] Aye
Rep. Rick Berg [R, ND-0] Aye
Rep. Shelley Berkley [D, NV-1] Aye
Rep. Howard Berman [D, CA-28] Aye
Rep. Judy Biggert [R, IL-13] Aye
Rep. Brian Bilbray [R, CA-50] Aye
Rep. Gus Bilirakis [R, FL-9] Aye
Rep. Sanford Bishop [D, GA-2] Aye
Rep. Timothy Bishop [D, NY-1] Aye
Rep. Rob Bishop [R, UT-1] Aye
Rep. Diane Black [R, TN-6] Aye
Rep. Marsha Blackburn [R, TN-7] Aye
Rep. Earl Blumenauer [D, OR-3] Nay
Rep. Jo Bonner [R, AL-1] Aye
Rep. Mary Bono Mack [R, CA-45] Aye
Rep. Dan Boren [D, OK-2] Aye
Rep. Leonard Boswell [D, IA-3] Aye
Rep. Charles Boustany [R, LA-7] Aye
Rep. Kevin Brady [R, TX-8] Aye
Rep. Robert Brady [D, PA-1] Aye
Rep. Bruce Braley [D, IA-1] Nay
Rep. Mo Brooks [R, AL-5] Aye
Rep. Paul Broun [R, GA-10] Aye
Rep. Corrine Brown [D, FL-3] Aye
Rep. Vern Buchanan [R, FL-13] Aye
Rep. Larry Bucshon [R, IN-8] Nay
Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle [R, NY-25] Aye
Rep. Michael Burgess [R, TX-26] Nay
Rep. Dan Burton [R, IN-5] Nay
Rep. George Butterfield [D, NC-1] Aye
Rep. Ken Calvert [R, CA-44] Aye
Rep. David Camp [R, MI-4] Aye
Rep. John Campbell [R, CA-48] Nay
Rep. Francisco Canseco [R, TX-23] Aye
Rep. Eric Cantor [R, VA-7] Aye
Rep. Shelley Capito [R, WV-2] Aye
Rep. Lois Capps [D, CA-23] Aye
Rep. Michael Capuano [D, MA-8] Nay
Rep. Dennis Cardoza [D, CA-18] Aye
Rep. Russ Carnahan [D, MO-3] Aye
Rep. John Carney [D, DE-0] Aye
Rep. André Carson [D, IN-7] Nay
Rep. John Carter [R, TX-31] Aye
Rep. Bill Cassidy [R, LA-6] Aye
Rep. Kathy Castor [D, FL-11] Aye
Rep. Steven Chabot [R, OH-1] Aye
Rep. Jason Chaffetz [R, UT-3] Nay
Rep. Ben Chandler [D, KY-6] Aye
Rep. Judy Chu [D, CA-32] Nay
Rep. David Cicilline [D, RI-1] Aye
Rep. Hansen Clarke [D, MI-13] Nay
Rep. Yvette Clarke [D, NY-11] Nay
Rep. William Clay [D, MO-1] Nay
Rep. Emanuel Cleaver [D, MO-5] Nay
Rep. James Clyburn [D, SC-6] Nay
Rep. Howard Coble [R, NC-6] Abstain
Rep. Mike Coffman [R, CO-6] Nay
Rep. Steve Cohen [D, TN-9] Nay
Rep. Tom Cole [R, OK-4] Aye
Rep. Michael Conaway [R, TX-11] Aye
Rep. Gerald Connolly [D, VA-11] Aye
Rep. John Conyers [D, MI-14] Nay
Rep. Jim Cooper [D, TN-5] Aye
Rep. Jim Costa [D, CA-20] Aye
Rep. Jerry Costello [D, IL-12] Nay
Rep. Joe Courtney [D, CT-2] Aye
Rep. Chip Cravaack [R, MN-8] Aye
Rep. Rick Crawford [R, AR-1] Aye
Rep. Ander Crenshaw [R, FL-4] Aye
Rep. Mark Critz [D, PA-12] Aye
Rep. Joseph Crowley [D, NY-7] Aye
Rep. Henry Cuellar [D, TX-28] Aye
Rep. John Culberson [R, TX-7] Aye
Rep. Elijah Cummings [D, MD-7] Nay
Rep. Geoff Davis [R, KY-4] Aye
Rep. Susan Davis [D, CA-53] Aye
Rep. Danny Davis [D, IL-7] Nay
Rep. Peter DeFazio [D, OR-4] Nay
Rep. Diana DeGette [D, CO-1] Nay
Rep. Rosa DeLauro [D, CT-3] Nay
Rep. Jeff Denham [R, CA-19] Aye
Rep. Charles Dent [R, PA-15] Aye
Rep. Scott DesJarlais [R, TN-4] Nay
Rep. Ted Deutch [D, FL-19] Aye
Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart [R, FL-21] Abstain
Rep. Norman Dicks [D, WA-6] Aye
Rep. John Dingell [D, MI-15] Aye
Rep. Lloyd Doggett [D, TX-25] Aye
Rep. Bob Dold [R, IL-10] Aye
Rep. Joe Donnelly [D, IN-2] Aye
Rep. Michael Doyle [D, PA-14] Nay
Rep. David Dreier [R, CA-26] Aye
Rep. Sean Duffy [R, WI-7] Aye
Rep. Jeff Duncan [R, SC-3] Nay
Rep. John Duncan [R, TN-2] Nay
Rep. Donna Edwards [D, MD-4] Nay
Rep. Keith Ellison [D, MN-5] Nay
Rep. Renee Ellmers [R, NC-2] Aye
Rep. Jo Ann Emerson [R, MO-8] Aye
Rep. Eliot Engel [D, NY-17] Aye
Rep. Anna Eshoo [D, CA-14] Nay
Rep. Blake Farenthold [R, TX-27] Aye
Rep. Sam Farr [D, CA-17] Nay
Rep. Chaka Fattah [D, PA-2] Nay
Rep. Bob Filner [D, CA-51] Abstain
Rep. Stephen Fincher [R, TN-8] Aye
Rep. Michael Fitzpatrick [R, PA-8] Aye
Rep. Jeff Flake [R, AZ-6] Nay
Rep. Chuck Fleischmann [R, TN-3] Aye
Rep. John Fleming [R, LA-4] Aye
Rep. Bill Flores [R, TX-17] Aye
Rep. Randy Forbes [R, VA-4] Nay
Rep. Jeffrey Fortenberry [R, NE-1] Aye
Rep. Virginia Foxx [R, NC-5] Aye
Rep. Barney Frank [D, MA-4] Nay
Rep. Trent Franks [R, AZ-2] Aye
Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen [R, NJ-11] Aye
Rep. Marcia Fudge [D, OH-11] Nay
Rep. Elton Gallegly [R, CA-24] Aye
Rep. John Garamendi [D, CA-10] Aye
Rep. Cory Gardner [R, CO-4] Aye
Rep. Scott Garrett [R, NJ-5] Nay
Rep. Jim Gerlach [R, PA-6] Aye
Rep. Bob Gibbs [R, OH-18] Aye
Rep. Chris Gibson [R, NY-20] Aye
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords [D, AZ-8] Abstain
Rep. John Gingrey [R, GA-11] Aye
Rep. Louis Gohmert [R, TX-1] Aye
Rep. Charles Gonzalez [D, TX-20] Aye
Rep. Robert Goodlatte [R, VA-6] Nay
Rep. Paul Gosar [R, AZ-1] Nay
Rep. Trey Gowdy [R, SC-4] Nay
Rep. Kay Granger [R, TX-12] Aye
Rep. Tom Graves [R, GA-9] Nay
Rep. Samuel Graves [R, MO-6] Aye
Rep. Al Green [D, TX-9] Aye
Rep. Raymond Green [D, TX-29] Aye
Rep. Tim Griffin [R, AR-2] Aye
Rep. Morgan Griffith [R, VA-9] Nay
Rep. Raul Grijalva [D, AZ-7] Nay
Rep. Michael Grimm [R, NY-13] Aye
Rep. Frank Guinta [R, NH-1] Aye
Rep. Brett Guthrie [R, KY-2] Aye
Rep. Luis Gutiérrez [D, IL-4] Abstain
Rep. Janice Hahn [D, CA-36] Nay
Rep. Ralph Hall [R, TX-4] Aye
Rep. Colleen Hanabusa [D, HI-1] Aye
Rep. Richard Hanna [R, NY-24] Aye
Rep. Gregg Harper [R, MS-3] Aye
Rep. Andy Harris [R, MD-1] Nay
Rep. Vicky Hartzler [R, MO-4] Aye
Rep. Alcee Hastings [D, FL-23] Nay
Rep. Doc Hastings [R, WA-4] Aye
Rep. Nan Hayworth [R, NY-19] Aye
Rep. Joe Heck [R, NV-3] Aye
Rep. Martin Heinrich [D, NM-1] Nay
Rep. Jeb Hensarling [R, TX-5] Aye
Rep. Walter Herger [R, CA-2] Aye
Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler [R, WA-3] Aye
Rep. Brian Higgins [D, NY-27] Aye
Rep. James Himes [D, CT-4] Aye
Rep. Maurice Hinchey [D, NY-22] Nay
Rep. Rubén Hinojosa [D, TX-15] Nay
Rep. Mazie Hirono [D, HI-2] Aye
Rep. Kathleen Hochul [D, NY-26] Aye
Rep. Tim Holden [D, PA-17] Aye
Rep. Rush Holt [D, NJ-12] Nay
Rep. Michael Honda [D, CA-15] Nay
Rep. Steny Hoyer [D, MD-5] Aye
Rep. Tim Huelskamp [R, KS-1] Nay
Rep. Bill Huizenga [R, MI-2] Nay
Rep. Randy Hultgren [R, IL-14] Aye
Rep. Duncan Hunter [R, CA-52] Aye
Rep. Robert Hurt [R, VA-5] Nay
Rep. Jay Inslee [D, WA-1] Aye
Rep. Steve Israel [D, NY-2] Aye
Rep. Darrell Issa [R, CA-49] Aye
Rep. Jesse Jackson [D, IL-2] Nay
Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee [D, TX-18] Aye
Rep. Lynn Jenkins [R, KS-2] Aye
Rep. Eddie Johnson [D, TX-30] Abstain
Rep. Samuel Johnson [R, TX-3] Aye
Rep. Bill Johnson [R, OH-6] Aye
Rep. Henry Johnson [D, GA-4] Nay
Rep. Timothy Johnson [R, IL-15] Nay
Rep. Walter Jones [R, NC-3] Nay
Rep. Jim Jordan [R, OH-4] Aye
Rep. Marcy Kaptur [D, OH-9] Nay
Rep. William Keating [D, MA-10] Aye
Rep. Mike Kelly [R, PA-3] Aye
Rep. Dale Kildee [D, MI-5] Aye
Rep. Ronald Kind [D, WI-3] Aye
Rep. Steve King [R, IA-5] Aye
Rep. Peter King [R, NY-3] Aye
Rep. Jack Kingston [R, GA-1] Aye
Rep. Adam Kinzinger [R, IL-11] Aye
Rep. Larry Kissell [D, NC-8] Aye
Rep. John Kline [R, MN-2] Aye
Rep. Dennis Kucinich [D, OH-10] Nay
Rep. Raúl Labrador [R, ID-1] Nay
Rep. Doug Lamborn [R, CO-5] Aye
Rep. Leonard Lance [R, NJ-7] Aye
Rep. Jeff Landry [R, LA-3] Aye
Rep. James Langevin [D, RI-2] Aye
Rep. James Lankford [R, OK-5] Aye
Rep. Rick Larsen [D, WA-2] Aye
Rep. John Larson [D, CT-1] Aye
Rep. Thomas Latham [R, IA-4] Aye
Rep. Steven LaTourette [R, OH-14] Abstain
Rep. Robert Latta [R, OH-5] Aye
Rep. Barbara Lee [D, CA-9] Nay
Rep. Sander Levin [D, MI-12] Aye
Rep. John Lewis [D, GA-5] Nay
Rep. Jerry Lewis [R, CA-41] Aye
Rep. Daniel Lipinski [D, IL-3] Aye
Rep. Frank LoBiondo [R, NJ-2] Aye
Rep. David Loebsack [D, IA-2] Aye
Rep. Zoe Lofgren [D, CA-16] Nay
Rep. Billy Long [R, MO-7] Aye
Rep. Nita Lowey [D, NY-18] Aye
Rep. Frank Lucas [R, OK-3] Aye
Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer [R, MO-9] Aye
Rep. Ben Luján [D, NM-3] Nay
Rep. Cynthia Lummis [R, WY-0] Nay
Rep. Daniel Lungren [R, CA-3] Aye
Rep. Stephen Lynch [D, MA-9] Abstain
Rep. Connie Mack [R, FL-14] Nay
Rep. Carolyn Maloney [D, NY-14] Nay
Rep. Donald Manzullo [R, IL-16] Aye
Rep. Kenny Marchant [R, TX-24] Aye
Rep. Thomas Marino [R, PA-10] Aye
Rep. Edward Markey [D, MA-7] Nay
Rep. Jim Matheson [D, UT-2] Aye
Rep. Doris Matsui [D, CA-5] Nay
Rep. Kevin McCarthy [R, CA-22] Aye
Rep. Carolyn McCarthy [D, NY-4] Aye
Rep. Michael McCaul [R, TX-10] Aye
Rep. Tom McClintock [R, CA-4] Nay
Rep. Betty McCollum [D, MN-4] Nay
Rep. Thaddeus McCotter [R, MI-11] Aye
Rep. James McDermott [D, WA-7] Nay
Rep. James McGovern [D, MA-3] Nay
Rep. Patrick McHenry [R, NC-10] Aye
Rep. Mike McIntyre [D, NC-7] Aye
Rep. Howard McKeon [R, CA-25] Aye
Rep. David McKinley [R, WV-1] Aye
Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers [R, WA-5] Aye
Rep. Jerry McNerney [D, CA-11] Aye
Rep. Patrick Meehan [R, PA-7] Aye
Rep. Gregory Meeks [D, NY-6] Nay
Rep. John Mica [R, FL-7] Aye
Rep. Michael Michaud [D, ME-2] Nay
Rep. Candice Miller [R, MI-10] Aye
Rep. George Miller [D, CA-7] Nay
Rep. Bradley Miller [D, NC-13] Nay
Rep. Gary Miller [R, CA-42] Aye
Rep. Jeff Miller [R, FL-1] Aye
Rep. Gwen Moore [D, WI-4] Nay
Rep. James Moran [D, VA-8] Nay
Rep. Mick Mulvaney [R, SC-5] Nay
Rep. Christopher Murphy [D, CT-5] Nay
Rep. Tim Murphy [R, PA-18] Aye
Rep. Sue Myrick [R, NC-9] Abstain
Rep. Jerrold Nadler [D, NY-8] Nay
Rep. Grace Napolitano [D, CA-38] Nay
Rep. Richard Neal [D, MA-2] Nay
Rep. Randy Neugebauer [R, TX-19] Aye
Rep. Kristi Noem [R, SD-0] Aye
Rep. Richard Nugent [R, FL-5] Aye
Rep. Devin Nunes [R, CA-21] Aye
Rep. Alan Nunnelee [R, MS-1] Aye
Rep. Pete Olson [R, TX-22] Aye
Rep. John Olver [D, MA-1] Nay
Rep. William Owens [D, NY-23] Aye
Rep. Steven Palazzo [R, MS-4] Aye
Rep. Frank Pallone [D, NJ-6] Nay
Rep. William Pascrell [D, NJ-8] Aye
Rep. Edward Pastor [D, AZ-4] Aye
Rep. Ronald Paul [R, TX-14] Abstain
Rep. Erik Paulsen [R, MN-3] Aye
Rep. Donald Payne [D, NJ-10] Nay
Rep. Steven Pearce [R, NM-2] Aye
Rep. Nancy Pelosi [D, CA-8] Aye
Rep. Mike Pence [R, IN-6] Nay
Rep. Ed Perlmutter [D, CO-7] Aye
Rep. Gary Peters [D, MI-9] Nay
Rep. Collin Peterson [D, MN-7] Aye
Rep. Thomas Petri [R, WI-6] Aye
Rep. Chellie Pingree [D, ME-1] Nay
Rep. Joseph Pitts [R, PA-16] Abstain
Rep. Todd Platts [R, PA-19] Aye
Rep. Ted Poe [R, TX-2] Aye
Rep. Jared Polis [D, CO-2] Nay
Rep. Mike Pompeo [R, KS-4] Aye
Rep. Bill Posey [R, FL-15] Nay
Rep. David Price [D, NC-4] Nay
Rep. Tom Price [R, GA-6] Aye
Rep. Ben Quayle [R, AZ-3] Aye
Rep. Mike Quigley [D, IL-5] Nay
Rep. Nick Rahall [D, WV-3] Aye
Rep. Charles Rangel [D, NY-15] Nay
Rep. Tom Reed [R, NY-29] Aye
Rep. Dennis Rehberg [R, MT-0] Aye
Rep. Dave Reichert [R, WA-8] Aye
Rep. Jim Renacci [R, OH-16] Aye
Rep. Silvestre Reyes [D, TX-16] Aye
Rep. Reid Ribble [R, WI-8] Nay
Rep. Laura Richardson [D, CA-37] Aye
Rep. Cedric Richmond [D, LA-2] Nay
Rep. Scott Rigell [R, VA-2] Aye
Rep. David Rivera [R, FL-25] Aye
Rep. Martha Roby [R, AL-2] Aye
Rep. Phil Roe [R, TN-1] Nay
Rep. Michael Rogers [R, MI-8] Aye
Rep. Harold Rogers [R, KY-5] Aye
Rep. Michael Rogers [R, AL-3] Aye
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher [R, CA-46] Nay
Rep. Todd Rokita [R, IN-4] Nay
Rep. Thomas Rooney [R, FL-16] Aye
Rep. Peter Roskam [R, IL-6] Aye
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen [R, FL-18] Aye
Rep. Dennis Ross [R, FL-12] Aye
Rep. Mike Ross [D, AR-4] Aye
Rep. Steven Rothman [D, NJ-9] Aye
Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard [D, CA-34] Nay
Rep. Edward Royce [R, CA-40] Nay
Rep. Jon Runyan [R, NJ-3] Aye
Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger [D, MD-2] Aye
Rep. Bobby Rush [D, IL-1] Nay
Rep. Timothy Ryan [D, OH-17] Nay
Rep. Paul Ryan [R, WI-1] Aye
Rep. Loretta Sanchez [D, CA-47] Abstain
Rep. Linda Sánchez [D, CA-39] Aye
Rep. John Sarbanes [D, MD-3] Nay
Rep. Steve Scalise [R, LA-1] Aye
Rep. Janice Schakowsky [D, IL-9] Nay
Rep. Adam Schiff [D, CA-29] Aye
Rep. Robert Schilling [R, IL-17] Aye
Rep. Jean Schmidt [R, OH-2] Aye
Rep. Aaron Schock [R, IL-18] Aye
Rep. Kurt Schrader [D, OR-5] Aye
Rep. Allyson Schwartz [D, PA-13] Aye
Rep. David Schweikert [R, AZ-5] Nay
Rep. Tim Scott [R, SC-1] Aye
Rep. David Scott [D, GA-13] Aye
Rep. Robert Scott [D, VA-3] Nay
Rep. Austin Scott [R, GA-8] Aye
Rep. James Sensenbrenner [R, WI-5] Aye
Rep. José Serrano [D, NY-16] Nay
Rep. Peter Sessions [R, TX-32] Aye
Rep. Terri Sewell [D, AL-7] Aye
Rep. Brad Sherman [D, CA-27] Aye
Rep. John Shimkus [R, IL-19] Aye
Rep. Heath Shuler [D, NC-11] Aye
Rep. William Shuster [R, PA-9] Aye
Rep. Michael Simpson [R, ID-2] Nay
Rep. Albio Sires [D, NJ-13] Aye
Rep. Louise Slaughter [D, NY-28] Nay
Rep. Christopher Smith [R, NJ-4] Aye
Rep. Adrian Smith [R, NE-3] Aye
Rep. Adam Smith [D, WA-9] Aye
Rep. Lamar Smith [R, TX-21] Aye
Rep. Steve Southerland [R, FL-2] Aye
Rep. Jackie Speier [D, CA-12] Nay
Rep. Fortney Stark [D, CA-13] Nay
Rep. Clifford Stearns [R, FL-6] Aye
Rep. Steve Stivers [R, OH-15] Aye
Rep. Marlin Stutzman [R, IN-3] Nay
Rep. John Sullivan [R, OK-1] Aye
Rep. Betty Sutton [D, OH-13] Aye
Rep. Lee Terry [R, NE-2] Aye
Rep. Bennie Thompson [D, MS-2] Nay
Rep. Glenn Thompson [R, PA-5] Aye
Rep. Michael Thompson [D, CA-1] Nay
Rep. William Thornberry [R, TX-13] Aye
Rep. Patrick Tiberi [R, OH-12] Aye
Rep. John Tierney [D, MA-6] Nay
Rep. Scott Tipton [R, CO-3] Nay
Rep. Paul Tonko [D, NY-21] Nay
Rep. Edolphus Towns [D, NY-10] Nay
Rep. Niki Tsongas [D, MA-5] Aye
Rep. Robert Turner [R, NY-9] Aye
Rep. Michael Turner [R, OH-3] Aye
Rep. Frederick Upton [R, MI-6] Aye
Rep. Christopher Van Hollen [D, MD-8] Nay
Rep. Nydia Velázquez [D, NY-12] Nay
Rep. Peter Visclosky [D, IN-1] Aye
Rep. Timothy Walberg [R, MI-7] Nay
Rep. Greg Walden [R, OR-2] Aye
Rep. Joe Walsh [R, IL-8] Nay
Rep. Timothy Walz [D, MN-1] Aye
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz [D, FL-20] Aye
Rep. Maxine Waters [D, CA-35] Nay
Rep. Melvin Watt [D, NC-12] Nay
Rep. Henry Waxman [D, CA-30] Aye
Rep. Daniel Webster [R, FL-8] Aye
Rep. Peter Welch [D, VT-0] Nay
Rep. Allen West [R, FL-22] Aye
Rep. Lynn Westmoreland [R, GA-3] Aye
Rep. Edward Whitfield [R, KY-1] Aye
Rep. Frederica Wilson [D, FL-17] Aye
Rep. Addison Wilson [R, SC-2] Aye
Rep. Rob Wittman [R, VA-1] Aye
Rep. Frank Wolf [R, VA-10] Aye
Rep. Steve Womack [R, AR-3] Aye
Rep. Rob Woodall [R, GA-7] Nay
Rep. Lynn Woolsey [D, CA-6] Nay
Rep. John Yarmuth [D, KY-3] Nay
Rep. Kevin Yoder [R, KS-3] Aye
Rep. Bill Young [R, FL-10] Abstain
Rep. Donald Young [R, AK-0] Aye
Rep. Todd Young [R, IN-9]
MY LETTER TO MY REPS;

I am writing you to express my dismay at your vote concerning The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 2012.  Your main purpose in Congress, as stated by your Oath of Office was to protect the Constitution and the rights of the citizens of this nation.  Your AYE vote on this Bill is blatantly just the exact opposite.  While the poorly crafted language is seemingly aimed at persons inside the United States who are aiding identified terrorist organizations, the language is purposely vague so that it could be interpreted in very broad terms and conditions which can be “cherry picked” and used against the citizenry in most draconian ways.  This Bill effectively tears up the intent of The Bill of Rights as written by our Founding Fathers.  You know this and you still voted in favor of passage of this Constitution crushing legislation.  In my opinion, you are unfit to serve because you willingly violated your oath of office and violated the rights of the citizens of Washington State.  I will not in any way shape or form, support you in your upcoming election.  In fact I think you should be recalled immediately.  I anticipate that your response to this letter will include your rational for this betrayal to your oath and to the citizens you were supposed to represent.  In that light, it will be shallow and not acceptable as usual.

CLICK THE PIC FOR THE VIDEO

REPLY FROM SENATOR PATTY MURRAY:

Thank you for contacting me with your concerns regarding military detention.  It is good to hear from you.  As you know, in the aftermath of the attacks of September 11, 2001, the Bush administration devised a new detention system outside of established legal structures of the U.S. criminal justice system and military courts-martial. Through legislation and a series of high-profile Supreme Court rulings, both Congress and the federal judiciary took action to clarify and limit parts of the Bush administration’s detention programs.  Although President Obama has taken some important steps toward the fair and humane treatment of detainees, I believe much more work has yet to be done. I continue to support closing the detention center at Guantanamo Bay and the ability of the Administration to try terror suspects in the U.S. federal court system.  The federal courts are well-equipped to handle these complex and difficult cases—since 2006, federal courts have successfully tried over 300 terrorism suspects while military commissions have tried only three.  I strongly support giving our military and intelligence agencies the tools they need to protect our nation and our service members. I understand some evidence against detainees may be too sensitive to national security to be presented in civilian court or may be tainted due to harsh interrogation techniques.  Right now, the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General can decide whether to use a military tribunal or a federal court.  I believe the Obama administration should continue to have the flexibility to decide on a case-by-case basis, and I opposed Republican amendments during consideration of the National Defense Authorization Act that would strip the President of this authority.

Please be assured that I will keep your views on this important topic in mind during the 112th Congress. If you would like to know more about my work in the United States Senate, please feel free to sign up for my weekly updates at http://murray.senate.gov/updates/. Thank you again for contacting me and please keep in touch.
Sincerely,

Patty Murray
United States Senator

(my comment; You see, she does not care about the Bill of Rights)

UPDATED 121911

Lawmaker obtains commitment to revisit detainee language

UPDATED 022112 REPLY FROM CONGRESSWOMAN JAIME HERRARA BEUTLER

February 14, 2012

Thank you for contacting me about Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).  It is an honor to represent the people of Southwest Washington, and it is important for me to hear from folks in our region.

I certainly understand your concerns about Sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA and how these sections impact our civil liberties and Constitutional rights.  I am a firm believer that your federal representative should take a proactive role in preserving your Constitutional rights.

I have not and will not support any legislation that would limit your Constitutional rights or allow American citizens to be detained under military authority and held without due process.  Please let me share with you why I believe the NDAA takes the proper steps to preserve your Constitutional rights and provide the President and our military with the tools they need to combat terrorism.

The NDAA reaffirms that the President may use “all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF)” against al Qaeda and the Taliban.  The AUMF was authorized following the September 11th terrorist attacks and had not been updated since it was originally sanctioned in 2001.  It is important to provide the President and our military with the resources they need to combat al Qaeda and the Taliban, and this bill accomplishes this goal by reaffirming current laws and without expanding presidential authority.

People had very valid and legitimate concerns about Section 1021 of the NDAA as it relates to the use of force.  Before voting for the NDAA I checked to make sure this legislation will not take away from or infringe upon your Constitutional rights.  The use of force does not apply to U.S. Citizens, in fact Section 1021, Subsection E which explicitly exempts U.S. citizens reads: (e) AUTHORITIES.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.

Section 1022 of the NDAA clarifies procedures for how non-U.S. citizens linked to al Qaeda or the Taliban are to be detained.  Evidence must be presented that demonstrates a foreign national’s link to al Qaeda or the Taliban in order for the detainment to be legal. This section clarifies that terrorists apprehended by law enforcement agencies must be held under military custody.  However, Section 1022, Subsection B explicitly exempts U.S. citizens and legal residents.  It reads:(b) APPLICABILITY TO UNITED STATES CITIZENS AND LAWFUL RESIDENT       ALIENS.—

(1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS.—The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States. 

(2) LAWFUL RESIDENT ALIENS.—The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to a lawful resident alien of the United States on the basis of conduct taking place within the United States, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States.

Our country continues to be under the very real threat of terrorism, and it is important to make sure our military is proper equipped to protect our citizens.  It is equally important for us to take steps to preserve and uphold our Constitutional rights.  The NDAA accomplish both of these goals.

Thank you again for contacting me on this important issue. I invite you to visit my website at www.HerrreraBeutler.house.gov for additional information or to sign up to be kept up to date on this important issue. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of assistance.

 
Sincerely,

Jaime Herrera Beutler
Member of Congress

Leave a comment

SPY STREETLIGHTS – IS BIG BROTHER IMPLIMENTING ANOTHER LAYER OF “SECURITY” BEHIND OUR BACKS?

After reading these revelations, I am convinced that DHS is implementing another layer of “big brother” security, all of course for our own good and safety and all.  YEA,…….RIGHT………. This is a bit too much to handle.  Check out the story here and look at the video and come up with your own conclusions…..

Leave a comment

(UPDATED 092711) GM – (GOVERNMENT MOTORS) TRACKING DRIVERS WITH ON-STAR EVEN IF YOU STOPPED YOUR ACCOUNT

JUST SAY NO!

Yes, I knew this was the case, that is why when recently I needed a newer vehicle, I bought a Ford.  I will never own a vehicle with On-Star or any other tracking system that the government has a hand in.  GM is saying that they maintain tracking data to include speed, and any other such data that is recorded in what is being called ” a black box for cars” that all these On-Star equipped vehicles have.  Where I go and how I go anywhere is no business of the government, especially without a search warrant, which I am sure would not be obtained in this case since the data is so easily obtained.  In my opinion, GM is totally corrupt and should have been allowed to go belly up.  Click the pic for the story.  And oh, by the way, That Progressive insurance ad that says that if you are a great driver, you get really good rates.  All you have to do is plug this in to your OBD 2 port to get the discount.  What “this” is, is a data recorder.  And what it records is all the data that your car’s computer tracks like speed, braking and other such stuff.  Be warned, that if you are involved in an accident and you have this device on your car, Progressive WILL use the data obtained to deny coverage if they find any data that could indicate you were speeding or anything else that they may find as grounds to not pay.  You’ve been warned………….  Flo Lies……

UPDATE 092711

On-Star says, Opps, Just Kidding!!  They backtrack on this plan after a revolt by Congress, Customers and others.  They say they will shut it off, but when was the last time any government entity told the truth?  (Yes, GM is a government entity)  I don’t believe a word of it.  How can that claim be tested?  I would like to know and have someone check it out.

Leave a comment

IS THIS AN APPROPRIATE USE OF TAX PAYERS DOLLARS, CLOSING CHILDRENS “LEMONADE” STANDS?

CLICK THE SIGN TO GET DETAILS OF THESE INCIDENTS....

Really?!  Is this what we have become?  I see story after story of this same type from all around the US and it both angers and frightens me.  I get angry over the fact that these over-zealous Law Enforcement types are spending our hard-earned tax dollars on harassing little kids who are doing nothing more that what we did as kids.  If even for a brief while, experience a sense of entrepreneurship that made America great.  Do these idiots get a huge sense of satisfaction when they shut these kids down?  I’m beginning to think that they do and that is the frightening part.  These over-zealous Cops, like the one who took the cameras in a previous post, are endangering what it means to be an American, and I think they like that.  It is these types of people who must be weeded out and fired.  It is these types that will break down your door on the orders of some corrupt politicians, simply because you may have said or written something they don’t like.  Gee, maybe I need to watch my back…….

ANOTHER INSTANCE OF OVER-ZEALOUS COPS and ANOTHER

2 Comments

OBAMA PLANS NEW GUN CONTROL PUSH (“UNDER THE RADAR”)

This is serious......

This article from Chuck Norris explains the new gun control scheme by Obama and his cronies.  As reported in POLITICO, Obama met with the Brady anti-gunners planning the UN Arms Trade Treaty.  This is serious and our 2nd amend. rights are under full assault.  Click HERE for an explanation of the treaty ratification process.  This is serious and patriots need to stand up on this!

Leave a comment

THE FACES OF TYRANNY – MAN ARRESTED FOR RECORDING A PUBLIC MEETING

The “Cops” in this video are in my opinion, traitors and thugs.  This is exactly what the Left wants.  They want to keep all their dirty dealings and backroom deals AND public deception secret.  There is no reason for this conduct in a Democracy and our Republic.  I hope this goes viral fast…

EMERGENCY

http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/24/reason-tv-why-i-was-arrested-yesterday-at-a-d-c-taxi-commission-meeting/

 

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/looselips/2011/06/23/watch-video-of-journalist-getting-arrested/

2 Comments

TODAYS RECOMMENDED READING

 

TODAY'S RECOMMENDED READING

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2001010/SWAT-team-launch-dawn-raid-family-home-collect-womans-unpaid-student-loans.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/education-secretary-duncan/ed-department-buying-27-shotgu.html

http://www.cnbc.com/id/43325286

http://www.infowars.com/breaking-secret-bilderberg-agenda-leaked-by-mole/

http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/dpp/news/taryn_asher/dad-special-needs-son-harassed-by-tsa-at-detroit-metropolitan-airport-20110608-wpms

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/minority-report-realized-creepy-homeland-security-mobile-malintent-pre-crime-screening-system-to-scan-americans-at-large-events-passes-first-round-of-testing/

http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=77923

http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2011/06/10/obamas_jobs_plan_takes_a_page_from_marx_99067.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2001593/Barack-Obama-invites-Gabon-dictator-Ali-Bongo-White-House.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/09/justice-officials-in-panic-mode-as-new-testimony-is-expected-to-reveal-depth/

http://www.timesnews.net/article.php?id=9032750

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/165651-aep-epa-regs-will-cost-billions-and-result-in-five-closed-plants

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/WeirdNews/2011/06/09/18261011.html

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/165759-report-nrc-chief-withheld-information-in-effort-to-abandon-yucca-mountain

http://michellemalkin.com/2011/06/08/dept-of-education/

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2011-06-08.html

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/janet-napolitano-using-common-sense-and-concentrating-terrorists-screening-on-muslim-men-under-35-is-not-good-logic/


			

Leave a comment

U.N. Agreement Should Have All Gun Owners Up In Arms

IS THIS THE FACE OF DOOM? Both Hillary and Barrack want your guns. Obama has always been and anti-gunner and remember the Clinton so called "Assault Gun Ban"?

The anti-gunners on the left are still at it.  If this UN agreement is allowed to pass, it will mean the end of the United States as a sovereign nation.  The UN and all our enemies want to see the US citizens disarmed.  This act will weaken the US to such a degree, we will cease to exist as a free nation.  I urge all to watch your Representatives and Senators closely.  Tell them what you think of this situation.  DO IT or LOSE IT! Click the pic for the story.

Leave a comment

APCO, SENATE DEMS PUSH FOR PUBLIC SAFETY BILL – For our own safety…

Is this where we are headed? Or are we already there?

As you read this story, you might think that it is a good idea that the police and fire departments get organized under an all encompassing communications system.  Hey, with all the terrorist threats that we are facing, that can’t be a bad thing can it?  We need the police to act in a unified, coordinated manner, as with the fire fighters, right?.  I mean, we need them to be “the tip of the spear” when emergencies arise across the country, right?   Well, if you look at it from the perspective of  “for real” acts of terrorism.  However, what does the government categorize as terrorism or extremist groups?  What about how this would enable the government/s across the nation to put down the citizenry exercising their constitutional rights under the Bill of Rights?  This proposal being put forth by the Dems, is nothing but a thinly veiled attempt to subvert and control the population in the guise of public safety.  Do you really think, after all we have seen coming from the Left, that this is an honest, malevolent attempt to protect the public?  I think not………Any attempt by the Feds or State governments to coordinate the police, is an attack on the Bill of Rights.  Don’t think so?  Think I am just an alarmist?  Well, I know some facts you all don’t, …..but I hope you all are right…..Think about it……

Leave a comment

FEMA teaching Law Enforcement people, Says Founding Fathers Are Terrorists……..WTF!!!!

This is the type of crap that MUST stop.  ALL these types of government people with this opinion, MUST be weeded out of their jobs.  I know this has been out for a while, but it deserves to be brought up again, and again, and again…..

Leave a comment

UPDATED 013011) INTERNET/SOCIAL NETWORKING AND PHONE SERVICE CUT IN EGYPT

DON'T THINK HE WOULD DO IT..? Click the pic for the story

HOT HOT HOT

The government in Egypt has cut all internet activities and phone service because the people are using it to organize and fight the establishment.  My point is; Who or what the “people” are fighting for is irrelevant.  What matters is the fact that the government controls these services and thus has the capability of thwarting the organization of any opposing forces in the country that use these conduits.  This would force these people to resort to other means to get information out.

Do you think that our government would do any different if “We The People” took constitutional action against our government in an effort to return it to a form the current “powers that be” would not stand for?  Maybe we should use Egypt as a guide and demand the Feds keep their hands off the internet and other forms of communications……….. Hey, I’m just thinking out loud……What do you think?

UPDATED 012811

More Info

UPDATED 013111

Obama’s buddies are trying to get the internet “kill switch” implemented as soon as possible.  Gee, I wonder what WA. Senators Murray and Cantwell think of this?……..Hmmmm  I’ll bet they are all for it…Like always, they say its a matter of national security in case of cyber attacks.  What they won’t come out and say is the fact that they want the ability to deny the American public the ability to organize and they are going to use the guise of cyber security to do it.  Write your Congressman NOW and tell them to not vote in favor of this legislation….Click here for the info.

Leave a comment

LAW ENFORCEMENT USE OF POCKET DRONES AND THE 4TH AMENDEMENT……..

ABUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION OR VALUABLE TOOL? Click the pic for the story

Ever since the advent of reconnaissance drones and the their use by the US Military, I have been concerned that their use on US soil was not far behind.  My concerns stem from the possibility of abuse by over zealous Law Enforcement Agencies who do not care about violating the 4th Amendment of the Bill of Rights prohibiting unlawful search.  In reading this article, it appears that I am not the only who is concerned about this trend.  This is another “Tool” that the zealous Law Enforcement types will justify its use by such language as; “To better safeguard the public”, “To provide a higher level of Officer Safety”, “To help Law Enforcement bring more bad guys to justice”, and the like.  It seems to me that there would be, or should be, two schools of thought on this that are being debated by the Agencies who are or who are looking into using these drones.  The first, would be what I just outlined above.  The second would be; “We need to look into the constitutionality of using these so we don’t overstep our authority and abuse someones rights, before we put these into use.  Now I can imagine that there are going to be Law Enforcement types who are going to read this article.  They will come to one of two possible conclusions about me.  The zealot will label me as, well, God know what, because those types of people demonize those like me.  Or two, this guy is a patriot who is exercising his 1st Amendment rights and is concerned about the Law Enforcement NOT overstepping its bounds and not going down the road to a full-blown Police State.   If you’re a Law Enforcement Type, which are you?  I was a military Law Enforcement Officer for almost 30 years.  In those years I came in contact with many Police Officers from the local areas and it is my opinion that at least 50% of those are Cops because of the “Power Trip”.  I worked shoulder to shoulder with these people and I come to my opinion by direct observation and experience.  So before you jump to the conclusion that I know nothing of which I speak, think again.  I took the oath to Preserve, Protect, and Defend the Constitution from all enemies, both foreign AND domestic many times in my career.  I took it to heart and live by it.  As a Law Enforcement Officer, are you a domestic enemy of the Constitution?  Look in the mirror and ask that question………If you care nothing of the Constitution and the rights of the citizenry, you need to find another endeavor.  One that does not allow you to exact your version of justice on the public.

//

1 Comment